Aristeidou, M., Scanlon, E., & Sharples, M. (2017). Profiles of engagement in online communities of citizen science participation. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 246–256. 

Bandura, A. (1978). Reflections on self-efficacy. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1(4), 237–269. 

Bio Innovation Service, Directorate-General for Environment (European Commission), Fundación Ibercivis, & The Natural History Museum. (2018). Citizen science for environmental policy: Development of an EU wide inventory and analysis of selected practices. Publications Office of the European Union.

Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K. V., & Shirk, J. (2009). Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy. BioScience, 59(11), 977–984. 

Cunha, D. G. F., Marques, J. F., Resende, J. C. D., Falco, P. B. D., Souza, C. M. D., & Loiselle, S. A. (2017). Citizen science participation in research in the environmental sciences: Key factors related to projects’ success and longevity. Anais Da Academia Brasileira De Ciencias, 89(3 Suppl), 2229–2245.

Davis, L. F., Ramírez-Andreotta, M. D., & Buxner, S. R. (2020). Engaging Diverse Citizen Scientists for Environmental Health: Recommendations from Participants and Promotoras. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1), 7.

European Commission. (2014). Green Paper on Citizen Science. Citizen Science for Europe.

Eveleigh, A., Jennett, C., Blandford, A., Brohan, P., & Cox, A. L. (2014). Designing for dabblers and deterring drop-outs in citizen science. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2985–2994. 

Goeschl, T., & Jürgens, O. (2012). Environmental quality and welfare effects of improving the reporting capability of citizen monitoring schemes. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 42(3), 264–286.

Göbel, C, Martin, VY and Ramirez-Andreotta, M. (2017). Stakeholder Analysis: International Citizen Science Stakeholder Analysis on Data Interoperability. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars. Available at (last accessed 23rd June 2021)

Guerrini, C. J., Majumder, M. A., Lewellyn, M. J., & McGuire, A. L. (2018). Citizen science, public policy. Science, 361(6398), 134–136.

Intemann, K. (2009). Why Diversity Matters: Understanding and Applying the Diversity Component of the National Science Foundation’s Broader Impacts Criterion. Social Epistemology, 23(3–4), 249–266.

Land-Zandstra A., Agnello G., Gültekin Y.S. (2021) Participants in Citizen Science. In: Vohland K. et al. (eds) The Science of Citizen Science. Springer, Cham.

Lee, T. K., Crowston, K., Harandi, M., Østerlund, C., & Miller, G. (2018). Appealing to different motivations in a message to recruit citizen scientists: Results of a field experiment. Journal of Science Communication, 17(1), A02.

McKiernan, E. C., Bourne, P. E., Brown, C. T., Buck, S., Kenall, A., Lin, J., McDougall, D., Nosek, B. A., Ram, K., Soderberg, C. K., Spies, J. R., Thaney, K., Updegrove, A., Woo, K. H., & Yarkoni, T. (2016). How open science helps researchers succeed. ELife, 5, e16800. 

Ottinger, G. (2017) ‘Reconstructing or Reproducing? Scientific authority and modes of change in two traditions of citizen science’, in Tyfield, D. (ed.) The Routledge handbook of the political economy of science. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY: Routledge.

Palmer, A., Reynolds, S. J., Lane, J., Dickey, R., & Greenhough, B. (2020). Getting to grips with wildlife research by citizen scientists: What role for regulation? People and Nature, 3(1).

Page, S. E. (2014). Where diversity comes from and why it matters? European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(4), 267–279.

Phillips, T. B., Ballard, H. L., Lewenstein, B. V., & Bonney, R. (2019). Engagement in science through citizen science: Moving beyond data collection. Science Education, 103(3), 665–690. 

Polleri, M. (2019). Conflictual collaboration: Citizen science and the governance of radioactive contamination after the Fukushima nuclear disaster. American Ethnologist, 46(2), 214–226.

Re Calegari, G:, Celino, I., Scrocca, M., González, E. & Zamorano, J. (2020). Participant motivation to engage in a citizen science campaign: The case of the TESS network.

Reynolds, A., & Lewis, D. (2017, March 30). Teams Solve Problems Faster When They’re More Cognitively Diverse. Harvard Business Review. 

Resnik, D. B. (2019). Citizen Scientists as Human Subjects: Ethical Issues. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1), 11.

Robinson, L. D., Cawthray, jade L., West, S. E., Bonn, A., & Ansine, J. (2018). Ten principles of citizen science. In Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy. UCL Press. 

Roman, D., Reeves, N., Gonzalez, E., Celino, I., Abd El Kader, S., Turk, P., Soylu, A., Corcho, O., Cedazo, R., Calegari, G., Scandolari, D., & Simperl, E. (2020). An analysis of pollution citizen science projects from the perspective of data science and open science.

Rotman, D., Preece, J., Hammock, J., Procita, K., Hansen, D., Parr, C., Lewis, D., & Jacobs, D. (2012, February). Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 217-226).

Schrögel, P., & Kolleck, A. (2019). The Many Faces of Participation in Science: Science & Technology Studies, 32(2), 77–99. 

Segal, A., Gal, Y. (Kobi), Simpson, R. J., Victoria Homsy, V., Hartswood, M., Page, K. R., & Jirotka, M. (2015). Improving Productivity in Citizen Science through Controlled Intervention. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, 331–337. 

Simperl, E., Reeves, N., Phethean, C., Lynes, T., & Tinati, R. (2018). Is Virtual Citizen Science A Game? ACM Transactions on Social Computing, 1(2), 1–39.

Schaefer, T., Kieslinger, B., & Fabian, C. M. (2020). Citizen-Based Air Quality Monitoring: The Impact on Individual Citizen Scientists and How to Leverage the Benefits to Affect Whole Regions. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1), 6.

Skarlatidou, A., Suškevičs, M., Göbel, C., Prūse, B., Tauginienė, L., Mascarenhas, A., Mazzonetto, M., Sheppard, A., Barrett, J., Haklay, M., Baruch, A., Moraitopoulou, E.-A., Austen, K., Baïz, I., Berditchevskaia, A., Berényi, E., Hoyte, S., Kleijssen, L., Kragh, G., Legris, M., Mansilla-Sanchez, A., Nold, C., Vitos, M. and Wyszomirski, P., (2019). The Value of Stakeholder Mapping to Enhance Co-Creation in Citizen Science Initiatives. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1), p.24. DOI:

Tinati, R., Luczak-Roesch, M., Simperl, E., & Hall, W. (2017). An investigation of player motivations in Eyewire, a gamified citizen science project. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 527–540.

Tinati, R., Van Kleek, M., Simperl, E., Luczak-Rösch, M., Simpson, R., & Shadbolt, N. (2015). Designing for Citizen Data Analysis: A Cross-Sectional Case Study of a Multi-Domain Citizen Science Platform. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 4069–4078.

Turbé, A., Barba, J., Pelacho, M., Mugdal, S., Robinson, L. D., Serrano-Sanz, F., Sanz, F., Tsinaraki, C., Rubio, J.-M., & Schade, S. (2019). Understanding the Citizen Science Landscape for European Environmental Policy: An Assessment and Recommendations. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1), 34.

Wiggins, A., & Crowston, K. (2011). From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science. 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–10.

Zhou, X., Tang, J., Zhao, Y. C., & Wang, T. (2020). Effects of feedback design and dispositional goal orientations on volunteer performance in citizen science projects. Computers in Human Behavior, 107, 106266.

Reach us

Email us for updates and further information

Leave a message

Privacy policy

7 + 6 =