Toolkit
References
Aristeidou, M., Scanlon, E., & Sharples, M. (2017). Profiles of engagement in online communities of citizen science participation. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 246–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.044
Austen, K, (2020a), ACTION Final Report First Round of the Call: Lessons Learned from Running a Citizen Science Accelerator* *during a Pandemic https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4533681
Austen, K. (2020b), ACTION Workshop Report 1 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5554639
Austen, K, (2021), Accelerating Citizen Science projects: Lessons from the Second Run https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5638907
Austen, K. (2022), ACTION Workshop Report 2: Practical Steps to Supporting Best Practice in Citizen Science https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5841614
Bandura, A. (1978). Reflections on self-efficacy. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1(4), 237–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6402(78)90012-7
Baroni, I., Celino, I., González Guardia, E.(2022), Final guidelines, recommendations and tools for quality assurance
Bio Innovation Service, Directorate-General for Environment (European Commission), Fundación Ibercivis, & The Natural History Museum. (2018). Citizen science for environmental policy: Development of an EU wide inventory and analysis of selected practices. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2779/961304
Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K. V., & Shirk, J. (2009). Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy. BioScience, 59(11), 977–984. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
Cunha, D. G. F., Marques, J. F., Resende, J. C. D., Falco, P. B. D., Souza, C. M. D., & Loiselle, S. A. (2017). Citizen science participation in research in the environmental sciences: Key factors related to projects’ success and longevity. Anais Da Academia Brasileira De Ciencias, 89(3 Suppl), 2229–2245. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201720160548
Davis, L. F., Ramírez-Andreotta, M. D., & Buxner, S. R. (2020). Engaging Diverse Citizen Scientists for Environmental Health: Recommendations from Participants and Promotoras. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.253
European Commission. (2014). Green Paper on Citizen Science. Citizen Science for Europe. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/green-paper-citizen-science-europe-towards-society-empowered-citizens-and-enhanced-research
Eveleigh, A., Jennett, C., Blandford, A., Brohan, P., & Cox, A. L. (2014). Designing for dabblers and deterring drop-outs in citizen science. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2985–2994. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557262
Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). A Fine is a Price. The Journal of Legal Studies, 29(1), 1–17.
Goeschl, T., & Jürgens, O. (2012). Environmental quality and welfare effects of improving the reporting capability of citizen monitoring schemes. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 42(3), 264–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-012-9191-6
Göbel, C, Martin, VY and Ramirez-Andreotta, M. (2017). Stakeholder Analysis: International Citizen Science Stakeholder Analysis on Data Interoperability. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars. Available at https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/international-citizen-science-stakeholder-analysis (last accessed 23rd June 2021)
Grossberndt, S.; Passani, A.; Di Lisio, G.; Janssen, A.; Castell, N. (2021) Transformative Potential and Learning Outcomes of Air Quality Citizen Science Projects in High Schools Using Low-Cost Sensors. Atmosphere, 12, 736. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12060736
Guerrini, C. J., Majumder, M. A., Lewellyn, M. J., & McGuire, A. L. (2018). Citizen science, public policy. Science, 361(6398), 134–136. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar8379
Intemann, K. (2009). Why Diversity Matters: Understanding and Applying the Diversity Component of the National Science Foundation’s Broader Impacts Criterion. Social Epistemology, 23(3–4), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720903364134
Land-Zandstra A., Agnello G., Gültekin Y.S. (2021) Participants in Citizen Science. In: Vohland K. et al. (eds) The Science of Citizen Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_13
Lee, T. K., Crowston, K., Harandi, M., Østerlund, C., & Miller, G. (2018). Appealing to different motivations in a message to recruit citizen scientists: Results of a field experiment. Journal of Science Communication, 17(1), A02. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.17010202
Maddalena, E., Baroni, I., Janssen, A., Thuermer, G. (2022) Final analysis and guidelines of incentives and motivation within citizen science
Martin, D., Carpendale, S., Gupta, N., Hoßfeld, T., Naderi, B., Redi, J., Siahaan, E. and Wechsung, I. (2017). Understanding the crowd: Ethical and practical matters in the academic use of crowdsourcing. In Evaluation in the crowd. crowdsourcing and human-centered experiments (pp. 27-69). Springer, Cham.
McKiernan, E. C., Bourne, P. E., Brown, C. T., Buck, S., Kenall, A., Lin, J., McDougall, D., Nosek, B. A., Ram, K., Soderberg, C. K., Spies, J. R., Thaney, K., Updegrove, A., Woo, K. H., & Yarkoni, T. (2016). How open science helps researchers succeed. ELife, 5, e16800. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16800
Ottinger, G. (2017) ‘Reconstructing or Reproducing? Scientific authority and modes of change in two traditions of citizen science’, in Tyfield, D. (ed.) The Routledge handbook of the political economy of science. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY: Routledge.
Palmer, A., Reynolds, S. J., Lane, J., Dickey, R., & Greenhough, B. (2020). Getting to grips with wildlife research by citizen scientists: What role for regulation? People and Nature, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10151
Page, S. E. (2014). Where diversity comes from and why it matters? European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(4), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2016
Passani, A., Janssen, A. & Hölscher, K. (2021). Impact assessment framework. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4432132
Phillips, T. B., Ballard, H. L., Lewenstein, B. V., & Bonney, R. (2019). Engagement in science through citizen science: Moving beyond data collection. Science Education, 103(3), 665–690. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21501
Polleri, M. (2019). Conflictual collaboration: Citizen science and the governance of radioactive contamination after the Fukushima nuclear disaster. American Ethnologist, 46(2), 214–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12763
Re Calegari, G:, Celino, I., Scrocca, M., González, E. & Zamorano, J. (2020). Participant motivation to engage in a citizen science campaign: The case of the TESS network. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4068333
Reeves, N., Celino, I., Re Calegari, G. (2021). D 5.6 – Initial analysis and guidelines of incentives and motivation within citizen science. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5553724
Reynolds, A., & Lewis, D. (2017, March 30). Teams Solve Problems Faster When They’re More Cognitively Diverse. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2017/03/teams-solve-problems-faster-when-theyre-more-cognitively-diverse
Resnik, D. B. (2019). Citizen Scientists as Human Subjects: Ethical Issues. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.150
Robinson, L. D., Cawthray, jade L., West, S. E., Bonn, A., & Ansine, J. (2018). Ten principles of citizen science. In Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy. UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv550cf2
Roman, D., Reeves, N., Gonzalez, E., Celino, I., Abd El Kader, S., Turk, P., Soylu, A., Corcho, O., Cedazo, R., Calegari, G., Scandolari, D., & Simperl, E. (2020). An analysis of pollution citizen science projects from the perspective of data science and open science. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29949.38886
Schrögel, P., & Kolleck, A. (2019). The Many Faces of Participation in Science: Science & Technology Studies, 32(2), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.59519
Segal, A., Gal, Y. (Kobi), Simpson, R. J., Victoria Homsy, V., Hartswood, M., Page, K. R., & Jirotka, M. (2015). Improving Productivity in Citizen Science through Controlled Intervention. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, 331–337. https://doi.org/10.1145/2740908.2743051
Simperl, E., Reeves, N., Phethean, C., Lynes, T., & Tinati, R. (2018). Is Virtual Citizen Science A Game? ACM Transactions on Social Computing, 1(2), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209960
Schaefer, T., Kieslinger, B., & Fabian, C. M. (2020). Citizen-Based Air Quality Monitoring: The Impact on Individual Citizen Scientists and How to Leverage the Benefits to Affect Whole Regions. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.245
Scrocca, M., Scandolari, D., Re Calegari, G., Baroni, I., & Celino, I. (2021). The Survey Ontology: Packaging Survey Research as Research Objects. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Data and Research Objects Management for Linked Open Science – co-located with ISWC 2021, https://doi.org/10.4126/FRL01-006429412
Skarlatidou, A., Suškevičs, M., Göbel, C., Prūse, B., Tauginienė, L., Mascarenhas, A., Mazzonetto, M., Sheppard, A., Barrett, J., Haklay, M., Baruch, A., Moraitopoulou, E.-A., Austen, K., Baïz, I., Berditchevskaia, A., Berényi, E., Hoyte, S., Kleijssen, L., Kragh, G., Legris, M., Mansilla-Sanchez, A., Nold, C., Vitos, M. and Wyszomirski, P., (2019). The Value of Stakeholder Mapping to Enhance Co-Creation in Citizen Science Initiatives. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1), p.24. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.226
Standing, S., & Standing, C. (2018). The ethical use of crowdsourcing. Business Ethics: A European Review, 27(1), 72-80.
Teacher, A. G. F., Griffiths, D. J., Hodgson, D. J., & Inger, R. (2013). Smartphones in ecology and evolution: A guide for the app-rehensive. Ecology and Evolution, 3(16), 5268–5278. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.888
Tinati, R., Luczak-Roesch, M., Simperl, E., & Hall, W. (2017). An investigation of player motivations in Eyewire, a gamified citizen science project. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.074
Tinati, R., Van Kleek, M., Simperl, E., Luczak-Rösch, M., Simpson, R., & Shadbolt, N. (2015). Designing for Citizen Data Analysis: A Cross-Sectional Case Study of a Multi-Domain Citizen Science Platform. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 4069–4078. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702420
Turbé, A., Barba, J., Pelacho, M., Mugdal, S., Robinson, L. D., Serrano-Sanz, F., Sanz, F., Tsinaraki, C., Rubio, J.-M., & Schade, S. (2019). Understanding the Citizen Science Landscape for European Environmental Policy: An Assessment and Recommendations. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.239