Aristeidou, M., Scanlon, E., & Sharples, M. (2017). Profiles of engagement in online communities of citizen science participation. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 246–256.

Austen, K, (2020a), ACTION Final Report First Round of the Call: Lessons Learned from Running a Citizen Science Accelerator* *during a Pandemic

Austen, K. (2020b), ACTION Workshop Report 1

Austen, K, (2021), Accelerating Citizen Science projects: Lessons from the Second Run

Austen, K. (2022), ACTION Workshop Report 2: Practical Steps to Supporting Best Practice in Citizen Science

Bandura, A. (1978). Reflections on self-efficacy. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1(4), 237–269.

Baroni, I., Celino, I., González Guardia, E.(2022), Final guidelines, recommendations and tools for quality assurance

Bio Innovation Service, Directorate-General for Environment (European Commission), Fundación Ibercivis, & The Natural History Museum. (2018). Citizen science for environmental policy: Development of an EU wide inventory and analysis of selected practices. Publications Office of the European Union.

Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K. V., & Shirk, J. (2009). Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy. BioScience, 59(11), 977–984.

Cunha, D. G. F., Marques, J. F., Resende, J. C. D., Falco, P. B. D., Souza, C. M. D., & Loiselle, S. A. (2017). Citizen science participation in research in the environmental sciences: Key factors related to projects’ success and longevity. Anais Da Academia Brasileira De Ciencias, 89(3 Suppl), 2229–2245.

Davis, L. F., Ramírez-Andreotta, M. D., & Buxner, S. R. (2020). Engaging Diverse Citizen Scientists for Environmental Health: Recommendations from Participants and Promotoras. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1), 7.

European Commission. (2014). Green Paper on Citizen Science. Citizen Science for Europe.

Eveleigh, A., Jennett, C., Blandford, A., Brohan, P., & Cox, A. L. (2014). Designing for dabblers and deterring drop-outs in citizen science. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2985–2994.

Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). A Fine is a Price. The Journal of Legal Studies, 29(1), 1–17.

Goeschl, T., & Jürgens, O. (2012). Environmental quality and welfare effects of improving the reporting capability of citizen monitoring schemes. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 42(3), 264–286.

Göbel, C, Martin, VY and Ramirez-Andreotta, M. (2017). Stakeholder Analysis: International Citizen Science Stakeholder Analysis on Data Interoperability. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars. Available at (last accessed 23rd June 2021)

Grossberndt, S.; Passani, A.; Di Lisio, G.; Janssen, A.; Castell, N. (2021) Transformative Potential and Learning Outcomes of Air Quality Citizen Science Projects in High Schools Using Low-Cost Sensors. Atmosphere, 12, 736.

Guerrini, C. J., Majumder, M. A., Lewellyn, M. J., & McGuire, A. L. (2018). Citizen science, public policy. Science, 361(6398), 134–136.

Intemann, K. (2009). Why Diversity Matters: Understanding and Applying the Diversity Component of the National Science Foundation’s Broader Impacts Criterion. Social Epistemology, 23(3–4), 249–266.

Land-Zandstra A., Agnello G., Gültekin Y.S. (2021) Participants in Citizen Science. In: Vohland K. et al. (eds) The Science of Citizen Science. Springer, Cham.

Lee, T. K., Crowston, K., Harandi, M., Østerlund, C., & Miller, G. (2018). Appealing to different motivations in a message to recruit citizen scientists: Results of a field experiment. Journal of Science Communication, 17(1), A02.

Maddalena, E., Baroni, I., Janssen, A., Thuermer, G. (2022) Final analysis and guidelines of incentives and motivation within citizen science

Martin, D., Carpendale, S., Gupta, N., Hoßfeld, T., Naderi, B., Redi, J., Siahaan, E. and Wechsung, I. (2017). Understanding the crowd: Ethical and practical matters in the academic use of crowdsourcing. In Evaluation in the crowd. crowdsourcing and human-centered experiments (pp. 27-69). Springer, Cham.

McKiernan, E. C., Bourne, P. E., Brown, C. T., Buck, S., Kenall, A., Lin, J., McDougall, D., Nosek, B. A., Ram, K., Soderberg, C. K., Spies, J. R., Thaney, K., Updegrove, A., Woo, K. H., & Yarkoni, T. (2016). How open science helps researchers succeed. ELife, 5, e16800.

Ottinger, G. (2017) ‘Reconstructing or Reproducing? Scientific authority and modes of change in two traditions of citizen science’, in Tyfield, D. (ed.) The Routledge handbook of the political economy of science. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY: Routledge.

Palmer, A., Reynolds, S. J., Lane, J., Dickey, R., & Greenhough, B. (2020). Getting to grips with wildlife research by citizen scientists: What role for regulation? People and Nature, 3(1).

Page, S. E. (2014). Where diversity comes from and why it matters? European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(4), 267–279.

Passani, A., Janssen, A. & Hölscher, K. (2021). Impact assessment framework. Zenodo.

Phillips, T. B., Ballard, H. L., Lewenstein, B. V., & Bonney, R. (2019). Engagement in science through citizen science: Moving beyond data collection. Science Education, 103(3), 665–690.

Polleri, M. (2019). Conflictual collaboration: Citizen science and the governance of radioactive contamination after the Fukushima nuclear disaster. American Ethnologist, 46(2), 214–226.

Re Calegari, G:, Celino, I., Scrocca, M., González, E. & Zamorano, J. (2020). Participant motivation to engage in a citizen science campaign: The case of the TESS network.

Reeves, N., Celino, I., Re Calegari, G. (2021). D 5.6 – Initial analysis and guidelines of incentives and motivation within citizen science.

Reynolds, A., & Lewis, D. (2017, March 30). Teams Solve Problems Faster When They’re More Cognitively Diverse. Harvard Business Review.

Resnik, D. B. (2019). Citizen Scientists as Human Subjects: Ethical Issues. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1), 11.

Robinson, L. D., Cawthray, jade L., West, S. E., Bonn, A., & Ansine, J. (2018). Ten principles of citizen science. In Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy. UCL Press.

Roman, D., Reeves, N., Gonzalez, E., Celino, I., Abd El Kader, S., Turk, P., Soylu, A., Corcho, O., Cedazo, R., Calegari, G., Scandolari, D., & Simperl, E. (2020). An analysis of pollution citizen science projects from the perspective of data science and open science.

Schrögel, P., & Kolleck, A. (2019). The Many Faces of Participation in Science: Science & Technology Studies, 32(2), 77–99.

Segal, A., Gal, Y. (Kobi), Simpson, R. J., Victoria Homsy, V., Hartswood, M., Page, K. R., & Jirotka, M. (2015). Improving Productivity in Citizen Science through Controlled Intervention. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, 331–337.

Simperl, E., Reeves, N., Phethean, C., Lynes, T., & Tinati, R. (2018). Is Virtual Citizen Science A Game? ACM Transactions on Social Computing, 1(2), 1–39.

Schaefer, T., Kieslinger, B., & Fabian, C. M. (2020). Citizen-Based Air Quality Monitoring: The Impact on Individual Citizen Scientists and How to Leverage the Benefits to Affect Whole Regions. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1), 6.

Scrocca, M., Scandolari, D., Re Calegari, G., Baroni, I., & Celino, I. (2021). The Survey Ontology: Packaging Survey Research as Research Objects. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Data and Research Objects Management for Linked Open Science – co-located with ISWC 2021,

Skarlatidou, A., Suškevičs, M., Göbel, C., Prūse, B., Tauginienė, L., Mascarenhas, A., Mazzonetto, M., Sheppard, A., Barrett, J., Haklay, M., Baruch, A., Moraitopoulou, E.-A., Austen, K., Baïz, I., Berditchevskaia, A., Berényi, E., Hoyte, S., Kleijssen, L., Kragh, G., Legris, M., Mansilla-Sanchez, A., Nold, C., Vitos, M. and Wyszomirski, P., (2019). The Value of Stakeholder Mapping to Enhance Co-Creation in Citizen Science Initiatives. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1), p.24. DOI:

Standing, S., & Standing, C. (2018). The ethical use of crowdsourcing. Business Ethics: A European Review, 27(1), 72-80.

Teacher, A. G. F., Griffiths, D. J., Hodgson, D. J., & Inger, R. (2013). Smartphones in ecology and evolution: A guide for the app-rehensive. Ecology and Evolution, 3(16), 5268–5278.

Tinati, R., Luczak-Roesch, M., Simperl, E., & Hall, W. (2017). An investigation of player motivations in Eyewire, a gamified citizen science project. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 527–540.

Tinati, R., Van Kleek, M., Simperl, E., Luczak-Rösch, M., Simpson, R., & Shadbolt, N. (2015). Designing for Citizen Data Analysis: A Cross-Sectional Case Study of a Multi-Domain Citizen Science Platform. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 4069–4078.

Turbé, A., Barba, J., Pelacho, M., Mugdal, S., Robinson, L. D., Serrano-Sanz, F., Sanz, F., Tsinaraki, C., Rubio, J.-M., & Schade, S. (2019). Understanding the Citizen Science Landscape for European Environmental Policy: An Assessment and Recommendations. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1), 34.